RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01421
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, Item 12B, Separation Date This Period, be corrected to
reflect 23 Oct 92, instead of 5 Mar 91, and Item 12C, Net Active
Service This Period, be corrected accordingly.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was honorably discharged 23 Oct 92; he was told he would
receive a retired Identification Card (ID).
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force
from 22 May 80 through 5 Mar 91.
On 5 Mar 91, the applicant was released from active duty and
transferred to the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) and
was credited with 10 years, 9 months, and 14 days of active
service.
On 5 Aug 92, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB)
conducted a periodic re-evaluation and determined that the
applicants diagnosis of right wrist pain, chronic (major), with
limited palmar flexion condition continued and was diagnosed as
having a somatoform disorder and remained unfit. The IPEB
recommended the applicant be removed from TDRL and discharged
with severance pay with a disability rating of ten percent.
On 23 Oct 92, because the applicants disability rating had
dropped below 30 percent he was discharged from the TDRL with
entitlement to disability severance pay.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. When a member is removed from the
Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) a new DD Form 214 is
not issued since the time spent on TDRL is not active duty time.
A new order indicates the applicants final status. This order
becomes a permanent part of you military personnel file, and can
be attached to the DD Form 214 reflecting that the final
disposition was removal from the TDRL and discharge with
severance pay effective 23 Oct 92. A new ID card is not
entitled when they are removed from TDRL and discharged with
severance pay as they are no longer in a retired status.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01421 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPFD, dated 16 Jun 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03839
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01516 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program for his medical conditions associated with application to the Board, AFBCMR Docket No. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02126
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice noting the applicant underwent his first periodic reexamination and was found fit and was removed from TDRL. On 13 Mar 13, the applicant was removed from the TDRL with the reentry code of 3K which allows the service member to be eligible to enlist in any branch of the service. If the medical condition has improved or stabilized, the service member could receive permanent disability...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03311
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, after admittedly making false statements regarding the extent of his injuries, the applicant's neurogenic bladder injuries were subsequently rated by the IPEB at 60...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | bc 2012 01218
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of a letter from her civilian medical provider, extracts from her medical records, AF Form 356, and other various documents in support of her application. On 29 Apr 11, the IPEB reviewed the applicants case, found her unfit and recommended she be removed from the TDRL and discharged with severance pay with a compensable disability rating of 10 percent for chronic law back pain in accordance with the Veterans...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03741
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Prior to the amendment to the law, members were retired in the grade they held on their date of separation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02678
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02678 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 29 Apr 11 placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) be changed so that he can reenter the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02246
On 16 Jan 98, he was scheduled for his first TDRL re-evaluation and the IPEB reviewed the medical information on 2 Feb 98 and recommended the applicant be removed from TDRL and DWSP with a 10 percent disability rating. Further, it must be noted the Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time of evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their condition at that time. A complete copy of the Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02764
On 4 Aug 11, the applicant waived his right to a formal hearing and requested the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) decide his case based on the medical records alone. According to Special Order ACD-93289 dated 1 Sep 11, effective 21 Sep 11, the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged in the grade of SSgt by reason of physical disability with entitlement to disability severance pay. When a member is removed from TDRL, a new DD Form 214 is not issued as the time spent on...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03014
Further, it must be noted the United States Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time of the evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their condition at that time. The result of the inquiry stated that he did not file VA Form 21-826, Notice to a Retired Veteran of his Right of Election to Receive Disability Compensation, within one year after his discharge. He feels he should receive all medical retirement compensation that was due from 27...